Time: 220.05.25 - 3 p.m. ((2026-06-04T00:22:50.701Z))

I have reviewed the evidence on this case, which was investigated in parallel with another case. While the laws do not have specific verbal requirements, I find the verbalization of the intent to confirm whether or not the aislings were sleephunting to be sufficient.

However, as found in Mileth Law (JA: SP&E A.2); 

The officer must show that the suspect is not on the officer's ignore list ((F9)).

This piece is missing in the evidence. Historically this was never required in older versions of Mileth Law. It is very clear that the individual was queried successfully way of whispers. 

I have no reason to suspect Snipar would intentionally ignore an aisling he intends to investigate, and it would be up to the aisling to prove this occurred at the time of the investigation. 

I will be issuing a major demerit for both cases missing this piece of evidence which is required by the law. Please be careful.

Zeo Lite, Guard Captain (6)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Time: 220.05.23 - 4 p.m. ((2026-06-03T18:30:29.388Z))

I am opening a review on this case executed by Snipar.

Please forward me the evidence within the next moon.

((zeixlite@gmail.com))

Zeo Lite, Guard Captain (6)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date/Time: 220.05.20 ((3/06/2026 - 5:28 P.M))
Place: Wasteland
Crime(s): Sleephunting
Subject's Name: Ionui

Description of Crime: 
I was taking a stroll through the Eastwood wastelands and came across this aisling bashing upon anothers pet octopus. The aisling was unrespondant through the excess amount of time given during the procedure and was banished. 

Witnesses: None
Evidence: Legilimency,Memories
Officials Present: Myself
Reporting Official: Snipar Guard (4)